Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Warning About BlowJobs For Men

This paragraph.....

"She asserts that when plaintiff 'delivered' his sperm, it was a gift - an absolute and irrevocable transfer of title to property from a donor to a donee," the decision said. "There was no agreement that the original deposit would be returned upon request."

comes from this article......

Court: Man Can Sue Over Surprise Pregnancy (My Way; Thursday 24th February 2005)


( 8 comments — Leave a comment )
Feb. 25th, 2005 10:19 am (UTC)
i have to agree galactically with the poor bloke. this is one of the reasons why women annoy me. at the end when she she says hows the child gonna feel that the its causing the father psychological distress. he didnt know about the fucking thing in the first place. it wasnt his choice! having a child should be an informed intelligent choice where both parents want it to happen. another reason why, although nik is annoying, at least both her and her man really want this kid and i know they'll love it lots.
grrr. birds, eh?
Feb. 25th, 2005 10:33 am (UTC)
I guess I'll just have to ask for any 'deposits' to be 'returned to me' in future!!! :p
Feb. 25th, 2005 02:53 pm (UTC)
Perhaps you could get a partner to sign a form waiving all rights to any secretions you make during sexual activity?
Feb. 25th, 2005 10:36 am (UTC)
Warning About BlowJobs For Men

When I first read this, my brain put it in the same category as "Nivea For Men" and "Head & Shoulders For Men"...
Feb. 25th, 2005 10:42 am (UTC)
This is truly awful. If true, that woman should NOT be allowed to claim child support from him. It was her choice to get pregnant. Sperm used in that way, without his consent, may have been a 'gift' for her but that still doesn't mean he should pay again and again and again for her choices.

Yes, there's a five year old child but whose fault is THAT?
Feb. 25th, 2005 10:58 am (UTC)
I once saw an American TV show (one of those Oprah clones) featuring a whole extended family of Southern rednecks who were living in a single trailer. One girl had wanted to have a baby, but didn't have a boyfriend, so her cousin had been performing blowjobs on her boyfriend (i.e. the cousin's boyfriend), going outside and spitting it into a dish, and then using that to try and artificially inseminate the girl who wanted the baby.

All without the knowledge of consent of the bloke concerned.

I fear that the above, tangled paragraph might be hideously confusing, so I'll restate it.

If a baby had been born (and thankfully, it was not) its father would have been its mother's cousin's boyfriend - a bloke with whom her mother had never had any kind of sexual relationship with, at all, whatsoever.

I'm not sure what the legal position would have been there, but I believe that in this country the bloke would still have been liable for child support. (I once read about a case where a bloke had had sex with a woman, but she admitted that she'd actually got pregnant by fishing the used condoms out of the bin and using the contents to artificially inseminate herself - and he was found liable, although I believe that in that case, the fact that he had had sex with her was regarded as significant).

There's probably a moral in all of this, but I'm not going to attempt to draw it. :)
Feb. 25th, 2005 11:46 am (UTC)
Don't have sex with rednecks?

I'd already gathered that from Deliverance.

Or are they hillbillies?

Feb. 25th, 2005 11:00 am (UTC)
it does make me feel all smug and responsible that ive been contraceptioning for years and years. i rock.
( 8 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

May 2015


Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow