Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

It says a lot on how far the government has drifted from it's left-wing roots when I find myself more and more agreeing with the Conservatives and looking forward to the day when the current Labour establishment get a big boot out of government.

I never thought I;d say it but I'm even agreeing with John Major (former Conservative Prime Minister) on his remarks about the War on Terror being blown out of all proportion and the goverment using the whole thing as scaremongers. The so-called 'Terrorist Threat' the UK is a so-called target of today is nothing compared to what the IRA ran here for decades on a much more sustained and constant level - yet the measures the government are trying to impose (42 day limit to hold a terrorist suspect without charge, etc) are so much more draconian.

(From The Times Online; Friday 6th June 2008; 42-Day Law Will Help Terrorists, Says Sir John Major)

Sir John’s attack is one of his strongest criticisms of Labour since he left office after the general election defeat of 1997. He broadened his critique from the issue of 42 days to wage an all-out attack on Labour’s conduct of the War on Terror since 2001. Sir John said that ancient British rights were under threat from a government that embellished the case for going to war in Iraq, was complicit in the rendition of suspects to the American internment camp at Guantanamo Bay and presented the public with a misleading case for introducing compulsory ID cards.

He writes: “If we are seen to defend our own values in a manner that does violence to them, then we run the risk of losing those values. Even worse, if our own standards fall it will serve to recruit terrorists more effectively than their own propaganda could ever hope to do. The Government has introduced measures to protect against terror. These go beyond anything contemplated when Britain faced far more regular – and no less violent – assaults from the IRA. The justification of these has sometimes come close to scaremongering.”

Sir John cautioned against the creation by Labour of “an intrusive State with authoritarian tendencies”. He added: “This is not a United Kingdom I recognise and Parliament should not accept it.”


I've been arguing for some time that the way parts of 'The West' have reacted to the 'Islamic Terrorist Threat' is helping the so-called threats recruitment no end. Putting into effect draconian laws - the forerunners of which have effected mooe innocents than that actual terrorists, including dawn raids and an innocent being shot in his home as it was being raided - seeming to target a subsector of our society (thus raising even further racial tensions and distrust in some areas which will only help alienated some people far enough into looking *for* something which will defend them and help them fight back against an unjust agressor) and a host of other things are doing anything but helping with the issues at hand. Invading countries under completely false pretenses and misleading information isn't heping matters much either!

It even seems that the 42-day limit is being initiated by the government as it's not something that MI5 has asked for (MI5 'Has not asked for 42 days'; BBC News Online; Sunday 8th June 2008) - so it's going ahead without the direct request of our countries security agency.

On top of all this the ID Card Scheme - which is supposed to start being implemented this year at the cost of billions of pounds which could be better used in Health Care, Education and other humanitarian areas which would be thousands of times more beneficial - has been the focus of renewed attacks and worries from a multi-party group of MPs in the Home Affairs Select Committee (ID Cards 'Could Threaten Privacy'; BBC News Online; Saturday 7th June 2008).

In one bright spark at the moment though is Clinton bowing out of the Presidential race (which in my mind she should have done weeks ago) and Obama looking all-set to start running his Presidentail campaign. Not only do I think he is the right man for the job in the States I think his election will benefit the world stage too. Obama has a lot of love out here in the international theatre and especially amongst a lot of disenfranchised and African communities. If Obama gets elected it will bring America a lot of goodwill - and in some areas which have been fairly anti-American recruitment ground before now too. I hope he manages to make it to the finishing post but don't envy the guy. Apart from having to fight a political battle he's also going to have to fight against the innate - and sometimes overt - racism that some parts of America and the establishment have. It will be a glorious day to see Obama as President but there's a long way to go before he gets there.


( 3 comments — Leave a comment )
Jun. 8th, 2008 10:25 am (UTC)
Labour's shift rightwards has resulted in some very odd political repositioning all round. I found myself applauding some surprisingly left-of-centre remarks by George Osbourne (shadow chancellor) at a meeting to oppose the expansion of Heathrow airport a while back. In a way, it felt Bad And Wrong to applaud a Tory (and an old Etonian toff-Tory, at that), but I think I would have felt downright contaminated to applaud any of the current Labour front-benchers.
Jun. 8th, 2008 11:03 pm (UTC)
> The so-called 'Terrorist Threat' the UK is a so-called target of today is nothing compared to what the IRA ran here for decades on a much more sustained and constant level - yet the measures the government are trying to impose (42 day limit to hold a terrorist suspect without charge, etc) are so much more draconian.

I'd say that what they're proposing right now is pretty similar to internment, back in the IRA days. They don't learn...

Worst thing is that, if the 42 day thing does get through, I doubt any subsequent government would repeal it, for fear of the risk of it actually impacting on a subsequent terrorist outrgae and them getting the blame.
Jun. 9th, 2008 07:33 am (UTC)
I have to admit I suspect the whole 'War on Terror' is largely being used as an excuse to clamp down on something our governments are really afraid of- anti-globalisation. The big shift Maggie Thatcher and Reagan instituted was a move from government listening to the electorate and a range of economic theorists to listening only to big business interests, and big business interests a) are making a LOT of money out of the 'War on Terror' and b) would be very threatened if the anti-globalisation movement had been able to expand and gain more support. Couple this with a sense that by and large whole chunks of the world economy would be entering meltdown over things like oil process and green issues and what you have is governments desperately concerned about maintaining public order, not about Muslim extremists blowing things up.

I am increasingly impressed with John Major-he was probably the best PM we had for a long while. Blair ended up taking much of the credit for his achievements (he was the one who bought the IRA to the table for instance) I am actually horrified I can say that as I have always been pretty anti-tory. I think the really sad thing is that people are stuck in this two party rut - its either labour or Conservative for people, yet actually in any meaningful way both parties are now almost identical. To my mind the best result for the country would be the unions dissafiliating from Labour so the Labour party collapses financially leaving room for another party to fill the gap who are more left wing like the Liberals (who damn well should get their act together) or maybe a completely new party taking a cue from Obhama and publicly distancing themselves from lobbyists/big business influences.
( 3 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

May 2015


Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow